Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/146,361,946,186,458,562,560,000
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was del. Reasonable info meoved elsewhere. mikka (t) 15:23, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 146,361,946,186,458,562,560,000
Per WikiProject Numbers, three (3) interesting properties are necessary to justify giving an article to a large number that is not a power of 10. Giftlite 23:32, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. There must be some other article that talks about the generic kind of thing that would make something like this interesting. linas 04:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I am getting weary of number articles. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 07:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable enough, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Numbers -- Egil 07:21, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable number. — JIP | Talk 07:27, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The only interesting property is that it's a unitary perfect number. This is noted at the article on unitary perfect numbers, and now also at Orders of magnitude (numbers), where other mildly interested large numbers are listed. Possibly, redirect to either of the articles I mentioned. Jitse Niesen (talk) 13:31, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
- Merge It could be merged with mathemetical facts, or some similar pages. But Relevancy is low...Rhetoricalwater 23:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as above - Bwfc 10:54, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Masterhatch 10:31, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Merge it somewhere, as said above. While the individual number itslef is not absolutely article worthy or interesting, a general discussion of similar numbers would be worhtwhile.
Cool3 04:01, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I think someone just wanted an article with their name on it Scythe33
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

