Talk:Arsphenamine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Arsphenamine is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the wikiproject's quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess. |
| Start | This page has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance assessment scale |
 |
Arsphenamine is part of WikiProject Pharmacology, a project to improve all Pharmacology-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other pharmacology articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
|
|
|
[edit] was
was this drug successful in treating syphilis? Kingturtle 00:11, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- See [[1]] -- TN 5th July 2005
[edit] copyright violation?
The text is almost if not identical to that @ http://salvarsan.biography.ms/.
Courtland 16:50, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)
Revised and corrected based on published literature.
Courtland 17:59, 2005 Mar 26 (UTC)
- Someone who understands Wiki reference formatting needs to revise the reference formats, which are a jumble of formats.
--Zeamays 17:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] structural formula
I would like to mention that already Cullen and Reimer in their comprehensive review on Arsenic Speciation in the environment (Chem. Rev. 1989, 89,713-764) mention that the structural formula of Salvarsan as represented with a double bound was incorrect and cite for this statement two articles from 1977 and 1979: Sarquis, M. J. Chem. Edu. 1979, 56, 815 Levinson, A. S. J. chem. Educ. 1977, 54, 98
therefore the statement that the true structure of this substance was only found in 2005 is not correct, at least not by itself, though of course it is possible that is was only in 2005 that this was proved.
Bereschit2007 15:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
shows the structure of salfarsan as 6 membered ring and this is printed way before 2005.--Stone 16:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
