From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Angelczek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Editorofthewikireview my edits here! 23:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page 1989 do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mkeranat (talk) 10:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Accounts
Angelczek (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • what links to user page • count COIBot • search an, ani, cn, an3 • user page logs • x-wiki • status • LinkWatcher search • Google)
76.79.110.130 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • what links to user page • COIBot • count • block log • x-wiki • search an, ani, cn, an3 • LinkWatcher search || WHOIS • RDNS • traceroute • CompleteWhois • ippages.com • robtex.com • tor • Google • AboutUs)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia.--Hu12 (talk) 10:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Angelczek". The reason given for Angelczek's block is: "Spamming links to external sites".
You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Sandstein 20:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
The reason I was blocked was because I supposedly linked to a non licensed site when in accuality we do have a license. I can provide the contract we have we intellivision.Angelczek (talk) 00:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "The reason why I was blocked was because I posted an external link to unlicensed material when in fact we have a 3 year contract with Intellivision which I can provide."
Decline reason: "You were blocked for adding links to your website - have a look at WP:SPAM.— PhilKnight (talk) 01:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I am not spamming. I followed the guidelines as listed in the WP:EL. We have licensed copywrited material which are trying to make available to the wiki users."
Decline reason: "It is clear that you do not understand the spam rules. A look at your contribution history indicates that your only interest in Wikipedia is promoting your web site, and that you have no interest in helping to write the encyclopedia. Your unblock requests indicate that, if unblocked, you would continue spamming. Therefore, you will not be unblocked. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I have made contributions to a couple of the years in music pages and have stopped in order to resolve the alleged spamming issue. Angelczek (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "Reviewing your contributions reveals few, if any, substantial contributions. Almost all of your edits are external links for the site indicated as a reason for your block. I see no evidence that you understand the nature of this block, or that you are willing to contribute positive to the encyclopedia. I have protected this talk page to prevent further abuse of unblock requests. --Kinu t/c 22:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
