Talk:Anglo Colombian School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on July 30, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 |
This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| High | This article has been rated as High-Importance within Schools. | |
 |
This article has been marked as needing an infobox. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Colombian WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to Colombia-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards. Click here and join us!. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
[edit] Article not neutral
The POV template has been added to the article due to its lack of neutrality, citations and relevance. What is the point of having such an article? to auto-proclaim itself? Please edit the article making sure it has a neutral stance and explain its relevance. Thank you
This article is self-propaganda, wikipedia is to laern not to post "the great achivements of some crappy school".
Resolution of POV dispute?: Who says? What is the evidence. There is no dispute... why not just change it?
Can you please supply some citations for alternative view and it would be nice to sign your contributions. There are quote marks above ... where are they quoted from? Victuallers 15:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Why is there a dispute for this article? It might be a sloppy article that needs sources, but a NPOV dispute? Someone needs to take that tag down. Canutethegreat 23:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Done! This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Assess
Important school. Needs pictures, infobox and references to be a great article. Schools project can help or try 10:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
P.S. A versian in Spanish? You can use the same pictures ...
