Talk:Angelique (Japanese series)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
Who put this in the Bishoujo game category? The only Angelique title that features a male lead dating girls is fan-made. I am removing this category.
Jan 26/07 - Why are the Angelique games classified as Dating Sim while Neo Angelique is Adventure/Dating Sim? They are all classified as adventure by their makers, and (for citation purposes) when you look them up on Amazon.co.jp they are under Adventure games. I am removing the Dating Sim-only heading and putting all the titles under Adventure/Dating Sim.Lijakaca 19:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Angelique is also not a visual novel, it's an adventure/dating sim. It has gameplay, not just dialogue choices. I am removing the visual novel tag from this article. If anyone disagrees we can discuss it, but I think keeping it in will muddy the whole question of what is a visual novel, and all that nasty debate. Lijakaca 18:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I also added the wp:vg tag and assessed it as start class.Lijakaca 19:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Angelique logo.gif
Image:Angelique logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
