From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Template:QD
[edit] Speedy deletion of Ambu A/S
A tag has been placed on Ambu A/S, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I have never published an article here before and have no clue, why the article was deleted. I have found many articles like this on wikipedia before, so I think the deletion is very unfair. I am also ready to edit the article if anyone thinks it is not suitable for wikipedia?!"
Decline reason: "A block notice should have been posted here. Nevertheless, after reviewing the block log, it appears you were blocked as your account appears to be a role account to be used by more than one person on behalf of AmbuCom ... which we don't allow. (I would have declined in any event because you used the unblock template to complain about your article getting deleted (as it should have been), which is not what it's for). — Daniel Case (talk) 13:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Ambucom has NOT been used by other users than me??!! Why do you suggest that? Please do unblock my account as this is very unfair"
Decline reason: "Above you claim you have never published an article here. This account created Ambu A/S (which has since been deleted). Either you did it, or someone else using this account did. — IrishGuy talk 14:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
