Talk:Age of Empires: Mythologies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Age of Empires: Mythologies article.

Article policies
Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
A request for box art or an application icon has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Knight chess piece This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within strategy games for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

This article is within the scope of the Age of Empires WikiProject, an effort to improve articles on the video games and expansions of these which compose the series.
Stub rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale
Mid rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale

[edit] Merging.

This article certainly should not be merged. If it's anything like the previous AoEDS, it's certainly got enough to differentiate it. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Wrong. We already have a FA versio of this article.Gears Of War 20:41, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Did you read what I said? This is a NINTENDO DS GAME. It is a DIFFERENT GAME. - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I agree with A Link that an unmerge is the way to go... but do you want to wait until after it's been released? (I don't mind either way; just that we'd have a better chance for sources etc. afterwards.) giggy (:O) 01:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
We may as well wait - it's coming out in only like five or so months, and I bet that there's even more information to add (heck, there's actually an interview about it, and I only really included the most basic content). - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)