Talk:After Burner II

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article is on a subject of Mid priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

This article is within the scope of the The Sega Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Sega products. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
High This article is on a subject of High priority within The Sega Project


[edit] Merge Afterburners

Should this article be merged with After Burner? They both contain nearly the same text and "after" all, they were pretty much the same game. Cpc464 13:23, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely not. Give it time, people will add more info to it. Another reason not to merge it, is because it will mess up the categories. Buzda 23:04, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

There is no need to merge Afterburner into Afterburner II or vice versa. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 01:15, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Do not merge them. I am removing the merge tags from both articles. Pepsidrinka 04:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Well, let's see what happens with the content. It's very confusing at the moment - screenshots from After Burner ports are in the After Burner II article; text is almost repeated verbatim between the two articles etc. Cpc464 08:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Correction: arcade system

I've changed the arcade system in the info box. While it is true that there was an After Burner II for the Megatech board [1], it was a port of a port (remember, the Megatech was an "arcadified" Mega Drive). The original game ran on the X Board hardware [2]. - Stormwatch 15:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of screenshot gallery

I'm not sure I'm happy with this. As far as I can tell, the consensus is that screenshot galleries are fair use, as long as the images are relevant to the article. --StuartBrady (Talk) 13:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)