User talk:91.108.250.247

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: ""Harrassment" of Onorem? Please check my contributions, I was simply relaying his message and my response to him, but another user decided to not let me"

Decline reason: "Reviewing your contributions, I was unable to find evidence that you have ever made a productive edit at Wikipedia. After your block expires, you are welcome to make productive edits. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Christopher Paul Neil, you will be blocked from editing. Onorem♠Dil 15:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

What makes you think it was vandalism? 91.108.250.247 (talk) 16:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I checked the artile that the issue is related to. It doesn't look like vandalism, but it isn't sourced either. I don't think the final warning was needed though :S (Terra Xin (talk) 16:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC))
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

This block is not just for vandalism (as noted, it may or may not be vandalism) but also for harassment of Onorem (talk · contribs). --Nlu (talk) 16:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)