User talk:82.204.47.120

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Interracial pornography. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 05:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Interracial pornography. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. I don't think that the content that you removed was "made up". It appears to have proper references. Andrew_pmk | Talk 05:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Interracial pornography, you will be blocked from editing. Andrew_pmk | Talk 05:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Interracial pornography, you will be blocked from editing. Talmage 05:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

No one is vanadlizing anything. I'm removing racist and liberlous comments that I thought was against the rules of wikipedia? Maybe i was wrong and it depnds on the persons and races involved when it comes to what kind of racism is allowed. I'm sure several dozen porn actors attorneys would be interested to read the libel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.204.47.120 (talk • contribs)

  • Comment: That may very well be so, but you shouldn't remove large chunks of an article like that without proper documentation on talk pages and in edit summaries, unless there is plagiarism involved. Edit, don't remove unless you properly document it. Talmage 05:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: After looking at the talk page, I think your deletion may have been warranted and consensus may have been established. I'll recommend you not be blocked. Talmage 05:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I'm still not sure why I am blocked. the overwhelming consesnsus was that the article needed serious culling of the libelous material and speculative statements. There are editors saying that the wiki had major flaws and none of them had any responses to them on the talk page."

Decline reason: "As explained by Luna Santin, this address appears to have been used by a blocked user to evade his/her block. Sorry for any inconvenience. - auburnpilot talk 16:29, 11 July 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

You may wish to see here, which will elaborate on what's already found in your block log. If you have an explanation for that, feel free. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Explain WHAT? Answer the question clearly and not with more of this cryptic nonsense.

The question of how you, as a brand new user, just happened to stumble into a dispute, immediately after someone sounding an awful lot like you was blocked for 24 hours for edit warring. – Luna Santin (talk) 00:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)