User talk:81.244.126.182

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As they say in the movies, "oh be-have". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write whatever you want (as long as it's not offensive).

[edit] POV edits

Please do not add your own personal theories to Wikipedia articles. Wikipedia is not a platform for them. -- ChrisO 17:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

ChrisO,

NB This is not Protestant belief nor is it Puritan.

By comparing Isis with a 'mother mary' all females have been collectivised in the catholic system into a general, global, femaleness, instead of being seen as individuals. It is therefore almost impossible to maintain a monogamous relationship as there is too much commonality and intermixing.

Similarly males have been collectivised into a general, global, 'maleness'.

By doing this the genders have become blurred and so there exists a 'third state' or 'third kind' which approaches the genderless via homosexuality, both male and female. This is hinted at in 'Strange Encounters of the Third Kind' and by the genderless or hermaphorodite form of 'Akhenaten' 'who is not a 'god' but merely an aspect' of creation.

The Great Ennead and Council of Nine are conflicting equal and opposite *aspects* of creation designed to automatically eradicte each other as time progresses.

It is therefore known to be an undesirable form of belief when it comes to maintaining morality.

Moreover it is pagan, by modern standards, and is based in animalism in which 'people' are interchangeable with animals, hence the Sphinx.

Not only this but it is also half and half, half red half black, half life half death, half 'heaven' half 'hell' half 'god' half satan' all of this deals with demi-gods or semi-gods and not human beings.

So can deduce from this that you are not regarded as human beings but as animals.

Then you need to examine double ma'at, or snake talk, (forked tongue) and realised that this ma'at also exists in Dutch where double-Dutch sums it up.

In this the Dutch words need careful examination as 'slang' means snake and 'bang' means fear.

This the 'one eyed trouser snake' (penis) (also considered ot be a lance as depicted by Egyptians in Chariots carrying a lance, and Lance-a-Lot which refers to 'Lot's wife') referred to in Monty Python's Flying Circus and the fear is of sex, which takes you to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.

So when the Litany mentions that, "In the second half of the World the World shall be given *over* unto satan there is reason for concern. Also when the Litany says they lie with their children it means to lie down together in an act of sex and this is seen as incestuous. So you may now understand why there are so many complex combinations in Egyptian creation mythology.

The construction of the catholic family is not that of a Protestant family where only immedite family is taken into consideration. The Roman Catholic church is seen as the broad church, very undefined and as the Ruinous Church as it leaves you with nothing. No-AH (Almight Highest or GOD proper) No-EL (El Shaddaï) No-thing. Where 'thing' refers to material possessions AND to your wife as in taking a hand in marriage as depicted by the hand in the Addams Family as shown on television.

You are here to be humiliated and the process is so slow as to be barely noticeable unless you are sensitive to your surroundings.

Christ was not nailed to a cross for fun nor for his own pleasure, nor was Osiris chopped up into seven pieces as an act of kindness, and catholic 'christianity' is directly derived from Egyptology.

We move on the the Vulgate mass which is considered to be vulgar.

Isis Osiris = IO = Io the satellite of Jupiter and also equals 10 (given as 5+5) but it also infers all acts of putting an I into an O as with ALL and any sexual act including the sexual acts of the animals, etc.

Unfortunately the number 5 corresponds with the letter E and the E stands for energy and for evil.

So 'human beings' and animals are NOT held to be distinct from one another in this system.

PAPE (Pope) is used as a shortened version of Paper and when the age of Aquarius takes you all back to the Nun in a final solution the paper tigers all turn to pulp. (Pulp fiction.)

This is not a personal 'theory' this is the facts of sticking to a system which is also based in red and black necromancy, (See Necropolis and necrotising faciitis) astrology, and numerology.

Drink the blood and eat the body of 'christ' refers both to 'people' AND to the planet on which they live, but your perception of this will not be clear until you open your eyes to ALL that is going on on the planet upon which you live. The blind leading the blind, blind to all that is happening around them. A priest is P-TAH the fisherman's way of stunning the prey just as a priest is used in angling (fishing with a fishing rod or fishing 'pole' yet another veiled reference to the male penis) to stun a fish. You are that fish, as P-TAH is a fisher of 'men' referring to men and wom(b)en. You are stunned by the beauty of beautiful women and stunned for each fault you may commit.

It is also a conflict between the Wicked Catholics and the Jealous Children where Protestants are referred to as dogs, catholics as cats and 'jew/dew(s)' as crows.

Women are also generally referred to as birds and so you will see that the labels given unto 'people' are the labels belonging to animals.

Not only this but, like the paintings on the walls of the Pyramids you are seen as two dimensional cartoons. Loony Toones, rabbits, bugs bunny, bugs, insects, all the creatures of the Earth and of the air and the sea, wandering about aimlessly.

To wander ("A Fish Called Wanda") in Dutch is vermindering and so you are reduced from 'human beings'to vermin.

This is how it actually is as opposed to what you may think it is.

81.244.126.182 17:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Huh? I'm not sure I understand what you mean. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 18:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

You are only given the semblance of human beings when, in fact, you are not human at all.

If you were truly human then religion would not be necessary and you would be secular.

Yeah I am secular. How about that? --M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 19:43, 21 May 2006 (UTC)