User talk:80.58.205.36

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Einstein field equations. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Bootstoots 21:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in MediaWiki talk:Recentchangestext. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --james(talk) 12:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 19:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Rotten Apple

Your recent edit to Rotten Apple (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. diff — riana_dzasta wreak havoc-damage report 11:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
W

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. -- GraemeL (talk) 11:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Roy Fisher

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Roy Fisher page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Runcorn 13:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hex (TV series)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hex (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

I see you seem to have trouble playing well with others. I am going to watch your contributions for a while. If I see any more of the nonsense you posted in Hex, you will be sitting in the corner, blocked again. Have a splendid day, sport. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 23:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Image talk:7-segment cdeg.svg

A tag has been placed on Image talk:7-segment cdeg.svg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.OsamaK 13:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Jennifer Lopez. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. - eo (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Jennifer Lopez discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1910s in fashion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bazzargh (talk) 13:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I wish someone could tell me how to communicate in private with you. The last edit I made was in some Malherbe entries, so those other vandals were not me. What I find to be an "unconstructive" and perverse form of vandalism is to use authority to insist on retaining WRONG information based on documental errors: if you found a drawing of a miniskirt dress dated 1870 would you rather believe that "proof" or a sensible expert? I know it was notr the proper way to edit, but I wanted to tell you that it was wrong. The only reason you could give to retain that piece of wrong information is that it was already there, but you didn't give any documental proof of its validity, and the only difference with my edit in that respect is that you were "formally" acceptable, while being actually, informatively unacceptably wrong, and in my case it was the other way round: someone who knows about the topic and not just about wikipolicy knows that part of the article is ridiculously wrong.

I happen to agree with you that the picture looks wrong, the way you phrased your edits is what attracted the vandalism tag. I've been checking up on that image since I did the revert, its no longer up at the Conde Nast archive but does appear to be misdated - the hat's attributed to Lucienne of Reboux, but the french article on Reboux says that Lucienne only started working there in 1920. If the pic dates from after 1923 it needs to be removed as a copyright violation anyway. BTW to talk to someone, just click on the 'talk' next to their signature and type an edit. I won't bite. --Bazzargh (talk) 13:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
What's more the pic is of Lady Abdy who would have been 12 in 1919. The date is definitely wrong. --Bazzargh (talk) 13:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Randomness, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Randomness was changed by 80.58.205.36 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-26T13:27:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)