User talk:80.176.254.65

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] February 2006

Thanks for experimenting with the page Romanticism on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Solipsist 16:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to 2006. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PCEevee talk 13:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Germany, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kusma (討論) 09:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

Your recent edit to Kit car (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 09:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Fan-1967 15:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Lithuania. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Sharonlees 15:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Battle of Dunkirk page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Yonatanh 15:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Your recent edit to Amesbury (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 11:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from ISP (disambiguation). Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac 02:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Teddy Sheringham, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite 18:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sensor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sensor was changed by 80.176.254.65 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-16T08:47:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 08:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Barcodes. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Barcodes was changed by 80.176.254.65 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-10-16T08:49:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 08:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Barcodes, you will be blocked from editing. Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 08:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jane Austen, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 10:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Philadelphia Eagles, you will be blocked from editing. Pats1 T/C 22:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Fred Dittman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 14:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edit on Lagrangian mechanics was a vandalism and has been reverted. Please, stop continuing your behaviour.--Filos96 (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)