User talk:75.55.220.96

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to John Wilkes Booth has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CapitalR (talk) 03:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to John Wilkes Booth (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 03:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sinophobia, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. cf38talk 09:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. LittleOldMe (talk) 09:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Just deleting text is not helpful. Poorly written portions can be improved. The only time I would consent to wholesale deletion is if the text is in violation of a Wikipedia fundamental principle such as copyright violation. Regards LittleOldMe (talk) 10:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)