User talk:64.72.65.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, rnn-cust.customer.hvdata.net, is registered to Hudson Valley DataNet (US), and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Harry Mazer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Madden Curse. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Madden Curse was changed by 64.72.65.130 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-04-29T12:34:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism, such as the edit you made to Hancock (film), continues, you will be blocked from editing. ~QuasiAbstract (talk/contrib) 15:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Portal:Current events/2008 April 29.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. TubularWorld (talk) 18:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. TubularWorld (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Carl Jung has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — αἰτίας •discussion• 13:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chris d'Lacey. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chris d'Lacey was changed by 64.72.65.130 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-05T15:14:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder was changed by 64.72.65.130 (u) (t) deleting 18203 characters on 2008-05-06T16:45:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Uncy

No, you added an external link as part of the content. It links to the site itself, not sister project site so is unencyclopedic. The links to the owners user pages were removed for exactly the same reason. A citation is already provided anyway.--Otterathome (talk) 14:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to George Armstrong Custer. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. sdgjake (talk) 16:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hancock (film), you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hancock (film) was changed by 64.72.65.130 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-09T15:21:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Manny Ramírez. Sceptre (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Rodgers (American Civil War naval officer), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Rodgers (American Civil War naval officer) was changed by 64.72.65.130 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-12T12:25:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Chris d'Lacey constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 14:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rock Band (video game). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg⊕⊗ 14:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chris d'Lacey, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chris d'Lacey was changed by 64.72.65.130 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-12T14:50:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. --  Netsnipe   ►  16:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was told this ban would expire on the 20th of May (today) around 1 O'clock. I come on at 1:43 local time, and find that my band has been extended (to tomorrow) without any contributions since the 13th of May. I want to know why this ban was expanded, and if for no reason, than I would perfer for the ban to be ended. Thank you."

Decline reason: "See Special:Contributions/64.72.65.130 and note the four disruptive edits between Talk:2008 Summer Olympics‎ and Talk:Gravitation‎ after your first three hour block expired. They are why this IP address is now blocked for a month. These blocks are only going to get longer and longer if the network administrator at your end doesn't take responsibility for the users on your network and puts an end to these shenanigans. --  Netsnipe   ►  17:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Before I say another word, I want to make it clear that I am requesting an admin OTHER THAN Netsnipe to review this block. While I am not afraid to admit that some fool using this IP went on a vandal spree, owing to the excellent tools Wikipedia has, all of those edits were almost instantly reverted, and in the scheme of things, how much damage was actually done? I am requesting to be unblocked because, simply, I see no point in a month-long ban for the action of one person, actions that, as I mentioned, were undone within seconds. And DON'T give me the "Just follow the procedure to get an accoung" brushoff. I will make it clear I do not want an account, and I see no reason as to why I should be required to. And if I may throw in a side note, for some obscene reason, my block was extended from June 12 to June 13, would anyone care to explain why?"

Decline reason: "I'm sorry - I can see that you're a good faith user trying to help here, but there's no way I can unblock this. We simply don't know who's behind this IP address at any given time. I can see you don't want to register an account - the reason you're required to is because the IP address that you're using has been vandalising this encyclopaedia. I'm really very sorry, but I don't think there's anything more we can do — Alex Muller 12:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.