User talk:61x62x61

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

———————————————61x62x61———————————————

\frac{dy}{dx} \int^{\pi}_{0}\frac{\cot x}{\csc^2 x} \sum^{\infty}_{i=0}\frac{1}{i!} \prod^{\infty}_{i=0}\frac{1}{i}
Userpage User Talk Contributions Sandbox



Welcome!

Hello, 61x62x61, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Firsfron of Ronchester 20:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Dinosaur classification

Hello, 61x62x61;

Thank you for your edits, but on Dinosaur classification I reverted to an earlier version because you had added original research (including Avimimoidea and Ceracephalosauria, two groups that have not been coined elsewhere) to a section that was tied to Michael Benton's classification scheme (available on this page). For reference, Wikipedia does not include original research, and it's never a good idea to change something that has a reference or footnote (unless the cited material is misquoted, of course). J. Spencer (talk) 23:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Avicephala and Reptile. Some of your edits constitute original research and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mark t young (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Atrociraptor. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 20:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


As per previous warnings, your continuing edits to Abelisaur, Velocisaurus, Masiakasaurus, Dinosaur classification, and Thecocoelurus are violating wikipedia's stance on original research. Please provide references if you are going to make extensive changes to dinosaur classification to support your edits, please see WP:verification. Mark t young (talk) 13:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

thanks for changing that for me on my page. i dont mind, however for others, i would ask before editing user pages. thanks again!the juggresurection IstKrieg! 03:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Changes to sourced information

Please stop changing information that is taken from published sources, as you recently did on Oviraptorosauria. By changing the order of the cladogram, you are misrepresenting the contents of the published paper Senter 2007. Senter did not place Hagryphus at the base of Caenagnathoidea, he placed it in a clade with Elmisaurus etc. If you feel you have a better or more current source, please discuss on Talk and if everyone agrees, we can change the whole ting and change the citation from Senter to someone else. Dinoguy2 (talk) 22:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jurassic timeline

Hi, I noticed you editing the Jurassic graphical timeline. It may save you time to know that Wikipedia has a policy saying something along the lines of "don't fix redirects that aren't broken". The user ends up at the same page, and the edits involved place unnecessary strain on the servers - as well as being a poor use of editors' time! Thanks for getting involved, though. Best wishes, Smith609 Talk 15:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


Ah, I see now that you have only just created the redirect page. Ignore me! Smith609 Talk 15:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nirvana logo

Hi. I removed the logo you added to Nirvana's info box. Logos and such are no longer wanted in infoboxes, all band names are just spelled with the normal WP font. This style rule was introduced a few months ago. (I think it's a shame, but anyway...)  Channel ®   09:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)