User talk:24.30.38.213

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, c-24-30-38-213.hsd1.ga.comcast.net, is registered to Comcast, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.

IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

1 Warnings
2 April 2008
3 Copyrights
4 May 2008
5 Melungeon editor
6 Legal threat
7 Melungeon
8 Your recent edits
9 Spam links
10 Your recent edits

[edit] Warnings

Old warnings

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Lost Tomb of Jesus. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 11:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Lost Tomb of Jesus, you will be blocked from editing. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 11:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] September 2007

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in User talk:AngelOfSadness, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Clubjuggle 08:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for harassing other users, edit such as the one you did on User talk:AngelOfSadness [1] are unacceptable and the break all that WP:CIVIL stand for, this combined with your past vandalism was taken under consideration when issuing this block. - Caribbean~H.Q. 09:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Your recent edit to I Love New York (TV series) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or YouTube/Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 23:46, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 24.30.38.213! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bvids\.myspace\.com\b, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot (talk) 18:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. AntiSpamBot (talk) 18:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I Love New York & Flavor of Love

If you would like to continue editing on wikipedia please learn how to speak and write correct english. Also please refrain from putting false information, or information without a source. --Yankeesrj12 (talk) 21:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to I Love New York (TV series), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Jonathan (talk • contribs • complain?) 15:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on I Love New York (TV series). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Jonathan (talk • contribs • complain?) 16:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Flavor of Love, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Macy's 123 review me 16:06, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. Your recent edits are vandalism. If you continue to vandalise, you may be blocked. Thank you. Majorly (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

- Caribbean~H.Q. 19:12, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism?

Sorry to disappoint you but that wasnt vandalism. Trivia sections are discouraged and that one was in very bad condition. If you would like to re-add it do so, but add sources, and proper english. Thanks! --Yankeesrj12 (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Shadow people has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 02:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Shadow people has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on shadow people as well as this talk page (which is not your talk page). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -Amatulić (talk) 21:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I regret to inform you that you have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring at Shadow people. In the future, please seek consensus for controversial edits rather than repeatedly reverting. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. If you wish to contest this block, you may add {{unblock|reason}} to your talk page. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to shadow people, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Amatulić (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Bias

NPOV requires views to be represented without bias. All editors and all sources have biases - what matters is how we combine them to create a neutral article.::

This is the Neutral point of view from Wikipedia. The Note section is NOT from me, it is from many people's documented testiomy. References have been supplied to show this. Allowing biased edits to this article which shows people who have seen shadow people yet have no mental or physical problems and have not done any drugs is violating the NPOV. The people that continue to vandalise my edits are Biased, a quick look at their wiki pages will prove this. Here is a copy and paste from "jeffire"'s wikie proflie....::I am a biologist but I also like to keep informed about other scientific fields.::

There's already a discussion underway at Talk:Shadow people. If you are interested in improving that article, please present your arguments there. References meeting WP:V and WP:RS requirements haven't been supplied. In short, re-write the section using unbiased language and cite specific references, and all will be well. Also, you can't judge bias by someone's user page, all you can judge is a conflict of interest, which doesn't exist for any editor of that article, as far as I can tell. -Amatulić (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Since your user page states you are a Scientist....(which you just eresed from above).....this proves you are Biased in removing edits which shows anything other than "Scientific" explainations. continue this and I will personally report you to the Wikipedia site OWNER himself. ::I'm a scientist who has worked as an engineer for the past 25 (approx) years, :: (from YOUR wiki profile.

Go ahead and report to "the owner" all you want. Please. I'm anxious to know the outcome.

Apologies for deleting that bit about me, but my status as a scientist is completely irrelevant to your argument. The issues here are neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing - and your edit meets none of Wikipedia's established criteria. As I said, fix those problems in the text, and it won't get reverted. You are being reverted according to Wikipedia policy and guidelines. Please resume this discussion on Talk:Shadow people where it belongs.

By the way, you just violated WP:3RR again. -Amatulić (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network.

In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "no edit warring no 3rr rule violation, I typed in the talk page of shadow people, there is a discussion going on to try and have the notes section added I was asked to prove supportive information to the types section so I added that"

Decline reason: "What do you call this little piece of vandalism? — Yamla (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

That was not vandlaism and it was only 1 revert. I simply added only what the person asked me to add. When I did the person removed it to keep anyone else from seeing it.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

apparently dynamic IP

Request handled by: Viridae ^Talk 10:29, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to shadow people. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You have been warned enough times, and you have not seriously attempted to engage in discussion to resolve your dispute, instead you engage in edit warring. Please be constructive. Talk it out on the talk page in a civil manner instead of edit-warring. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to WDCG has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:16, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure what I did was proper, but the article is the way it should be. The user seems to have reverted my work in moving information from the heading "controversy" to the heading "Bob and the Showgram" and changing the references to proper form. I also expanded on what was covered under "controversy" and hope I have improved the article.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 16:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyrights

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Celebracadabra, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pinkadelica 08:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The recent edit you made to Melungeon constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted; please do not continue to remove content. Thanks. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 09:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC))

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Melugeon article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Village pump". You can also leave a message on my talk page. delldot talk 10:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to clarify: Certainly no disrespect intendeded to you or anyone. We're very glad to have your contributions, it just has to be in your own words, not copied from anywhere. Don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or need anything, I'm always glad to help. Peace, delldot talk 10:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the note! I'm certainly sorry to hear about all the hardship you have gone through. All you need to do to be allowed to use content from the site on Wikipedia would be to change the copyright information on the website itself releasing the content under a free license (such as the GFDL). Otherwise we cannot use that exact content. You could also email wikimedia with permission to use the content, I can help you do either of these things. Otherwise, I'm sorry, but we can't use that exact material, you'll have to reword it in your own words. It's a very hard and fast rule of wikipedia - no copyrighted content. Sorry, I have to go now, but I'll be glad to help with whatever you need when you get back. Peace, delldot talk 10:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Saponi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Melungeon. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Aramgar (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Melungeon editor

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (24.30.38.213) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Aramgar (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Melungeon ip editor: Please consult the talk page of the Melungeon article for an explanation of the changes made to your edits. Please follow this link: Talk:Melungeon#Collins_family_in_VA. Regards, Aramgar (talk) 18:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Legal threat

Hello, I noticed in this edit you are implying legal action against another user. Please read Wikipedia's policy on making legal threats. Are you willing to retract your threat? We can take a look at your concerns over the article, but threatening legal action is not allowed. Thanks. APK ^{yada yada} 19:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

You have not replied. I'm asking you again, are you going to retract your legal threat? An answer is necessary before you continue editing. Also, I've once again removed the external link you keep adding. Please read WP:EL again. The link is not appropriate for the article. APK ^{yada yada} 00:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Catawba (tribe). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg^⊕^⊗ 19:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Melungeon

It's inappropriate for you to threaten me or to accuse me of racism or assume anything by my other work. Please see the Melungeon Talk/Discussion page (behind the article). Other editors also reverted your addition on the Collins and Saponi heritage because it did not satisfy reliable third-party sources. You can take up with them whether this is appropriate and how best to use the sources. I have not dealt with all the edits on the page, so cannot comment on other material that may have been added by Jack Goins. It would be more appropriate for you to add to the section below in the article, in which Everett's theory about links to Saponi Indians is discussed (and discarded because Everett found that John Collins was not Indian.) I do not have a personal stake in this.--Parkwells (talk) 19:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spam links

Hello, IP Collins descendant -- I'm sorry, but the links you provided do fall under our definition of links to be avoided: please see Wikipedia:EL#Links_normally_to_be_avoided, especially point 10. I understand your frustration -- Wikipedia rules and policies can seem difficult and even incomprehensible at first. Might I suggest registering for an account and signing up for a mentor? There is surely a way to incorporate your information according to policy, if you are willing to work with other editors. :) My friend Aramgar is of Collins descent too, through the Magoffin County line -- perhaps not close kin, but still kin. Kafka Liz (talk) 01:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]

Categories: Shared IP addresses

User talk:24.30.38.213

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Warnings

[edit] July 2007

[edit] September 2007

[edit] Blocked

[edit] December 2007

[edit] I Love New York & Flavor of Love

[edit] Blocked

[edit] Vandalism?

[edit] February 2008

[edit] March 2008

[edit] April 2008

[edit] Copyrights

[edit] May 2008

[edit] Melungeon editor

[edit] Legal threat

[edit] Melungeon

[edit] Your recent edits

[edit] Spam links

[edit] Your recent edits

Views

Navigation

Interaction

Search