User talk:24.243.5.91

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] 3RR warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. // Pilotguy (Have your say) 20:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 20:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

I am sorry if I reverted actual content, but to an untrained eye, your link looked like spam. I apologize. Enjoy Wikipedia!  DangerousNerd  talk 20:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Link or spam?

My understanding of what constitutes an acceptable link on Wikipedia must be a narrower than yours. According to WP:EL, blogs are normally to be avoided except for "those written by a recognized authority." Given the subject matter, I plead ignorance on what constitutes "a recognized authority" on this article, and will leave it to others to decide. However, the presence of a blog link on the page does not by itself justify the addition of another. WP's guideline is "they should be kept to a minimum of those that are meritable, accessible and appropriate to the article." -- Sfmammamia 22:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay, but just be aware that if another editor comes along today and deletes the same link from the same article and you reinstate it again, you may be called out over the three-revert rule. By the way, Wikipedia etiquette is to put new posts on talk pages at the bottom of the page. See WP:TALK -- Sfmammamia 22:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)