User talk:24.243.187.152

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Andy Milonakis Show page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 00:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the The Andy Milonakis Show page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 01:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 02:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Personal attacks are NOT tolerated on Wikipedia. Post an offensive message one more time, and you will be blocked by an administrator. If you want to vandalize, why don't you head on to uncyclopedia.org and do it there. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 02:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Wildnox(talk) 02:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

this. I also removed your personal attack.--Wildnox(talk) 02:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I understand what you're trying to do. You're trying to be funny. This is wikipedia and therefore not a place to make jokes. If you wish to make jokes, please head to uncyclopedia, where jokes are welcome. --Wildnox(talk) 02:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Also, vandalism aside, you've violated WP:3RR on the article. --Wildnox(talk) 02:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Honestly, I have no idea why you just made a monopoly joke on my talk page, so I removed it. --Wildnox(talk) 02:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

This is completely unacceptable. First, you've vandalized the article, second, you made personal attacks to multiple Wikipedians, and third, you've violated the three-revert-rule. I'm sure an administrator will come by and block you from any further malicious edits. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 02:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] No personal attacks

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 02:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been warned to stop multiple times. I suggest you heed those warnings instead of making snide comments. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 02:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I suggest you stop these personal attacks, as an administrator such as Physicq210 may block you from editing any minute. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 02:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to The Andy Milonakis Show, you will be blocked. -SpuriousQ (talk) 02:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reported

You have been reported to administrators concerning your persistent, blatent, and/or disruptive vandalism. John Reaves (talk) 03:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

What the hell are you talking about? John Reaves (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by replying here on your talk page, by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .

-- Gogo Dodo 03:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] How long have I been blocked for?

24.243.187.152 03:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

When the block expires, feel free to edit Wikipedia as long as you don't vandalize and make personal attacks. I hope you have learned something from this block. And no, your edits were entirely vandalism and disruptive personal attacks.~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 03:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

No, my edits were entirely reasonable within the context of the article. I'm sorry you felt the need to revert them, but that's really your problem. My "attacks" (if you want to call them that -- what I asked was that you actually take the time to read & understand the edit instead of tripping the rvv hammer) were in fact entirely impersonal, as they had nothing to do with you, only your edits. This is how adults act. Deal with it. 24.243.187.152 03:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

As for "Kuru", he/she apparently can't read either. Maybe somebody should look at the edits in question before launching into arias about "nonsense", "attacks" and various other hyperbole. 24.243.187.152 03:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Insulting everyone you see will not get you unblocked. --Wildnox(talk) 03:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Insulting people and saying "This is how adults act, deal with it" will only double the block time. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 03:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

What insult? My opinion is that there's a lot of hyperbole here. I fail to see how this is an "insult" or a "personal attack". Being hypersensitive does not make you right. Having an echo chamber does not make you right. 24.243.187.152 03:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore, don't make threats from a position of zero power, Eugene XXX state of the union. It makes you look childish, foolish and other words ending in -ish. 24.243.187.152 03:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

It's obvious that what you said is a personal attack to everyone except you. You're the one being childish here, now stop the insults. By the way, I don't see how what I said is a threat. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 03:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

You don't see how saying "If you continue doing xxxxx, greater punishment will befall you!" is a threat? Please save us all the oxygen and fucking kill yourself if you really don't understand this. 24.243.187.152 03:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

To be honest, telling somebody that you would have his block lengthened is a bit of a threat. --Wildnox(talk) 03:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

You've been blocked for 31 hours. John Reaves (talk) 03:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

Unsubstantiated? Take a look at your contribs log and stop lying. Your comments are not hyperbole; they are disruption, personal attacks, stupidity, and immaturity all rolled into one. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm "lying"? If I didn't know better, that's not only a personal attack, stupid and immature, but also highly disruptive to the panacea that is Wikipedia. Please cease and desist IMMEDIATELYwere disruptive to my talk page, stupid, and immature. But I wouldn't say that.

Do you think everyone who disagrees with your opinion is a liar? 24.243.187.152 03:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

No, I call liars liars. I am a firm believer of WP:SPADE. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Is that anything like WP:ROTOTILLER? 24.243.187.152 15:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

But let me elaborate. All of us, like you, have a sense of humor; however, all of us, unlike you, know where to draw a line. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Now you're definitely acting childish and immature. Posting images all over your talk page? It's what people call annoying. You are one of the worst vandals I have seen on Wikipedia. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 03:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Good argument. Down with userboxes! Who's with me? 24.243.187.152 15:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Who are you talking to? Me, or the IP? --²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

EugeneXtreme isn't really sure what the hell he's talking about. My experience is that this isn't uncommon. 24.243.187.152 03:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Obviously, since you're using yourself as exhibit A for your argument. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC) Oops, sorry to offend the hypocritical IP. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

The Wiktionary exists for people who aren't quite sure what "hypocrisy" means. Hint: It doesn't mean "I don't like you, Mr. IP, you big meanie." 24.243.187.152 15:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

(Edit conflict)Can we just sprotect this page and finish this? Also, I think Eugene was talking to Mr.IP --Wildnox(talk) 03:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

24.243.187.152, would you stop with the nasty comments? It's what people call rude and disruptive. ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 03:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

(to IP) Do not consider calling someone a "fucknut" (not an actual word by the way) an attack? John Reaves (talk) 03:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, now that you've pointed out that it's not an actual word, you've certainly wrested the upper hand in this argument! The pedantry is what was missing from your airtight reasoning! (P.S. speaking of pedantry, is there a word missing from your sentence, or are you just bad at the whole "typing" thing?) 24.243.187.152 15:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Stopped the trolling with some semi-protection of this page. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I have extended the block

Don't waste editors' time. When your block is over in two days, come back and contribute positively, or don't come back. Either way, I'm not going to spoon you.--Chris Griswold (☎☓) 08:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I can't figure out if Mr. Griswold was a) considering cuddling with me b) feeding me or c) something having to do with The Matrix. I'd rather not find out.

It's interesting that the actions of a cabal of editors who decide to spend a lot of time editing my talk page are somehow my fault. You'd think they could take responsibility for how they spend their time and the choices they make. In fact, there are two distinct times to make a good choice: a) Choosing not to read my talk page, and b) choosing not to edit my talk page. You'd think declining to do a) would prevent them from doing b), yet they chose to do both.

Oh, and don't waste my time, Griswold, with this irrelevancy. 24.243.187.152 15:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, this is much cleverer in this order. Good edit. --Future Fun Jumper (TIC) 23:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Deleting line breaks is putting things in a different order? Okay. 24.243.187.152 03:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Falling into the mountain

In the 1980s, David Geffen sued Neil Young for making "unrepresentative" music -- that is, for not sounding enough like Neil Young. You'd think was just about as silly as the world could get, until somebody with a fistful of gumption and a pocketful of moxie actually thought it made sense to "prevent IP from trolling on own talk page". Because that's, y'know, possible. Does this really represent any sort of reasoning? 24.243.187.152 14:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Everyone's sick of your insults. Now please, why don't you actually act a bit more mature? ~~Eugene2x ^{Sign here} ☺ ~~ 21:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Gee, that sounds like an insult, Genie. STOP TROLLING MY TALK PAGE IT NEEDS PROTECTION 24.243.187.152 21:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

"yet you are starting this act again?" Here's a hint: If you don't want to read what I have to say, maybe you shouldn't visit my talk page and read what I say. 24.243.187.152 03:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

Hi. Your edit comments such as "let's mythologize this fucker" are perhaps amusing, and you're making good edits, so tone down the comments, please, or someone (not me!) is going to get sufficiently pissed off to block you and/or revert your edits without even looking at them, which would be a loss for Wikipedia (and a waste of your time.) Just because someone is being an asshole doesn't mean you get to call them an asshole -- at least, not here, where we try to keep things at a more civil level. What's the point of sullying your own good work that way? --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 01:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Trivia (disambiguation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reginmund 15:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.Neil ム 17:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Feb 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Af648 09:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]