User talk:24.109.94.208

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page The Robber Bride on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Shadowlynk 10:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

With regards to your comments on User:Shadowlynk: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. -- Shadowlynk 11:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Luigi30 (Taλk) 12:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

I have removed material from SooToday.com that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, particularly negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 20:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

You are entitled to your opinions. But an encyclopedia article is not for pushing them. We insist on neutrality. If you want an article to mention negative coverage, then 1) the curiticism must have come from a notable source, b) it needs to record where that criticism has come from c) you need a reliable source to support it. I've blocked you for 24 hours as you don't seem to understand this. I will unblock if you post here indicating that you do. If you keep reinserting this material in the same manner, you will be blocked for much longer periods. --Docg 09:04, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at Virginia Tech Massacre. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. --Dynaflow 03:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] From my Talk page

[edit] Sup.

A little late on the ball, no? Days after the change was made you followed up with backseat Wikipolicing of my, granted, sour joke. Do you routinely run about frantically making sure to threaten everybody who has ever had a revision revoked? Get a life.

Oh, and restricting of my editing abilities? Oh, goodness me, what would I do without my precious trivial acerbic jokes on Wikipedia? My house of cards is surely on the brink of collapse! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.109.94.208 (talk • contribs)

I sent you a warning last week (check the date) for vandalizing the article Virginia Tech massacre by adding it to the video game category First Person Shooters (a change which I reverted). Neither I nor anyone else has (yet) blocked your editing privileges since November, when you were blocked twice in succession, including once for what one administrator memorably summed up as "vandalism, stupidity." --Dynaflow 16:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)