User talk:213.138.128.45

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] March 2007

Your recent edit to Zits (comic strip) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 07:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to George Frideric Handel, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stephen Burnett 07:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Åland, you will be blocked from editing. Tiddly-Tom 09:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 10:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Alabama, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

You have recently vandalized the Wikipedia page Talk:Will Smith, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hu12 (talk) 06:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Doyle Brunson, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Doyle Brunson was changed by 213.138.128.45 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-10T10:26:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Tripe (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Footloose (musical). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 11:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Centaur (typeface), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. LeaveSleaves (talk) 09:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Centaur (typeface). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CSumit (talk) 09:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Deep Purple has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. MBisanz talk 06:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sloth, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sloth was changed by 213.138.128.45 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-09T08:48:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Lord of Miracles has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 09:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ukko. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ukko was changed by 213.138.128.45 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-13T07:38:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger (talk) 07:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jake has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CapitalR (talk) 07:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)