User talk:209.253.119.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- GraemeL (talk) 21:46, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. RexNL 23:03, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Argentina, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:22, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kassemann, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Culverin? Talk 07:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to L (New York City Subway service). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri (talk . contribs) 22:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Motorcycle Diaries (film). Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ali 01:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Emporis link on CS article

Hi! I wanted to let you know I removed the link again, and stated reasons for doing so on the talk page of the article. I know Emporis links tend to be popular on these types of articles, but there is no need to have a duplicate link in the CS article (one in notes, one in EL). Lets bring the discussion over there, if you oppose those reasons. Thanks, Chupper 13:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion

You recently made comments about this article on its talk page. ESRB re-rating of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. JMcC (talk) 16:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)