User talk:209.106.0.250

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 209.106.0.250, is registered to Missouri Research & Education Network and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Pluto. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Nebular110 17:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Black Parade. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheRanger 19:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Lucky (memoir). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Budgiekiller 16:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 03-Nov-2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Lucky (memoir) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.Chris Kreider 16:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --I already forgot 14:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Mikey Way

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. ► Adriaan90 ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ 18:04, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Incarnate Word Academy (Bel-Nor, Missouri)

Your recent edit to Incarnate Word Academy (Bel-Nor, Missouri) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 13 December 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kubigula (talk) 19:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kubigula (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Ed (Edgar181) 20:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Incarnate Word Academy (Bel-Nor, Missouri). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.- Gilliam 18:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Mary Church Terrell on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Mus Musculus (talk) 19:31, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Buddhism, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bikeable (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Buddhism. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Nihiltres(t.c.s) 17:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Stem cell controversy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)