User talk:206.124.31.24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] I realize this is a tad unusual

But it seems the disputes here have been resolved. I think a blanking of all the personal attacks (whether striken or not) would be good. Let's forget it happened and continue with this encyclopedia. 69.145.123.171 Yes, I'm really an IP address Sunday, September 17, 2006, 04:21 (UTC)

[edit] Is this a good place to contact you?

I know you have three talk pages now, but I was wondering which IP address I should add to my list of friends. —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  01:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Yeah...this is the right one...until my ISP gives me a new IP :-( 206.124.31.24 11:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
So after that happens, should I still contact you at User talk:206.124.31.24? (By the way, if you plan on not registering, and if you like, I can help you make a signature, for example like at User:69.145.123.171/sig.) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  15:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
For now, this IP works. Don't know when they'll reassign the address, though. 206.124.31.24 11:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, when they do, can you tell me which talk page to use? If your IP address keeps changing, you may wish to stay here or on one consistent talk page. (69.145.123.171 (talk · contribs), for example, is now 172.190.47.40 (talk · contribs).) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  16:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] America: From Freedom to Fascism

Dear anonymous editor at IP 206.124.31.24: Please do not add unsourced references to phantom Supreme Court decisions without first discussing them on the talk (discussion) page for the article. These kinds of issues (related to Tax protester arguments) have already been discussed at length here in Wikipedia, so you may want to participate in the discussion. Thanks, Famspear 15:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

As demonstrated within the context of that discussion, the Supreme Court decisions were not "phantom" decisions. 206.124.31.24 18:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Dear user at IP 206.124.31.24: As demonstrated within the context of that discussion, the Supreme Court decisions you cited definitely were phantom decisions, as the "decisions" you cited do not exist. As shown in the discussion, the actual decisions in the cases you cited were essentially the opposite of what you claimed they were. Yours, Famspear 19:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Because you and your legal cult have chosen to ignore them does not make them "phantom decisions." They obviously exist, since you argued their meaning. 206.124.31.24 19:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Irwin Schiff

Sorry, it was an honest mistake. I'm a recent changes patroller, and when going through the recent changes I spotted this as a large-scale deletion by an anon IP, which usually means vandalism. Once again, I apologise - bona-fide edits sometimes slip through the net during the fight against vandalism. Feel free to revert my edit. (By the way, as you're clearly an active editor, why don't you create a username and log on? It would make it much easier to identify you as a bona-fide contributor in future.) Walton monarchist89 20:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but I'd rather refrain from assisting in my own harassment by people who don't like supporters of liberty and self-ownership. I'd prefer to remain anonymous for that reason. 206.124.31.24 21:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
OK fair enough, it's your choice. Another thing you should do, to make it easier for us RC patrollers, is always use an edit summary explaining your edit; this shows up on the RC screen. In this case, for instance, you could have typed moving paragraph per discussion on the talkpage into the edit-summary box; I would have seen this, and not reverted your edit. Walton monarchist89 21:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Yes. Sorry, I neglected to do that. Ironically, I was trying to complete the edit swiftly in two parts so that it wouldn't be considered a removal.206.124.31.24 21:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New messages bar

Yeah, I have that problem myself on my home PC sometimes. I think it depends on your browser - sometimes pages will be cached and the browser will simply show you the old version, complete with messages bar. Alternatively, it could be a Wikipedia problem to do with you editing from an anon IP; I'm not sure about this since I never use an anon IP myself. Walton monarchist89 09:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)