User talk:204.102.211.115

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 204.102.211.115, is registered to Glendale Community College (California) and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Mátyás Rákosi

I'd answered on Talk page (+ my opinion on it). Pavel Vozenilek 05:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 16, 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Holodomor. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 21:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] test3

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also, avoid personal attacks. You may see yourself blocked even sooner. --Irpen 21:58, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Will (E@) T 20:34, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I did not vandalize anything. You have extensively been proven false in the discussion section of the subject in concern.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 20:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

RexNL 20:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Cossack. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Waggers 21:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Dhartung | Talk 18:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Warsaw Pact. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Dhartung | Talk 19:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NATO

Please do not edit the description of NATO, it is based on its constitutional text and merely refers to it. It is not an opinion. Nonetheless, I have added Yugoslavia's description of the Kosovo War was an undeclared act of aggression. This will make the article more balanced. Feel free to open an account and contribute with bona-fide edits to Wikipedia. Make sure you familiarise with its guidelines and policies beforehand. Regards, Asteriontalk 19:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] a polite request

Dear sir (or madam)! Kindly take the time to open up a Wikipedia account and get in the habit of signing your messages! Otherwise it would be all too easy for people to mistake you for, oh I don't know, an obnoxious komcsi troll with too much time on their hands? (though I can't imagine how anyone could get THAT impression.) Yours sincerely, K. Lastochka 21:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense edit in Georg Forster

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Georg Forster. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you would be ever so kind. Chodorkovskiy (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Second language acquisition

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Second language acquisition. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo 00:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Polish legislative election, 1947:

Your recent edit to Polish legislative election, 1947 (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism or link spam to the page. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Vlad 03:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Polish legislative election, 1947, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. delldot | talk 03:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for a month.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 04:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2007 January

Please do not continue to remove academic sources from Vladimir Lenin. Your reversions stand in violation of WP:3RR. Rklawton 20:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

2nd Warning: do not continue to remove academic sources from Vladimir Lenin. Your reversions stand in violation of WP:3RR. Rklawton 20:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not target one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rklawton 20:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked for disruptive editing at Vladimir Lenin and continually disruptive editing despite numerous blocks and warnings for a period of one hundred thousand minutes. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 21:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is a school IP address. Several people use it."

Decline reason: "Tweaked the block a bit -- you'll be able to edit if you register an account. Please do so. :) – Luna Santin (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


[edit] May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to History. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —dima/talk/ 00:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Wire (TV series). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. east.718 02:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 19:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This IP address, 204.102.211.115, is registered to Glendale Community College (California and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution."

Decline reason: "Long history of sockpuppetry here. Please create a user account elsewhere and use that here. Thank you. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Jacob Peters

  • Decline reason:

Please create a user account elsewhere; there's been too much abuse from this IP to allow anonymous editing or account creation. — jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Occupation of Baltic states, you will be blocked from editing. -- Sander Säde 20:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This IP address is registered to Glendale Community College (California) and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. In the case of institutions using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers. For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may get blocked for another user's vandalism."

Decline reason: "That is not a reason for unblocking.— Mr.Z-man 04:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This IP address belongs to a school library that is used by multiple persons."

Decline reason: "You have already been told that this is not a reason for unblocking. — Yamla (talk) 21:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This IP address is that of a school library. This has happened to this IP address in the past and when the problem was addressed, the IP was unblocked."

Decline reason: "Actually, the block log only appears to show unblocks to alter the length of the block...never a full unblock due to complaints. — IrishGuy talk 01:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.