User talk:194.72.35.70

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 194.72.35.70, is registered to RWE NPower, UK. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact RWE NPower, UK to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, RWE NPower, UK, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Guitar Hero II. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. The Kinslayer 13:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Steven McEwan

An editor with this IP address wrote in Talk:Steven McEwan as though he was the subject of that article. Thank you... do you have references for this to allow us to put some of that info in the article proper? If you are Steven McEwan, it would be useful to add some of the above information to the article; however we can't use information on Wikipedia that does not have a verifiable source that others can refer to. Is there a book, magazine article etc that contains the information you mention above? If so, I'd be very happy to add it. (Comment copied from the Talk page of the above-mentioned article) Loganberry (Talk) 14:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Beyoncé Knowles, you will be blocked from editing. Leafyplant 17:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Giampaolo Pazzini

Your recent edit to Giampaolo Pazzini (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Doyle Brunson. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 14:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Martin Brittain, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. — Rlest 12:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Red Carpet Massacre, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. - eo 16:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during December 11, 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Epbr123 (talk) 14:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Kingswinford School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BigDunc (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sigma Cassiopeiae, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Maximillion Pegasus (talk) 13:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Eddie Izzard. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 10:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to ABC-DEF-GHI, you will be blocked from editing. Puchiko (Talk-email) 15:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page TEMA (group) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/gruppacomma) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Bucket has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Cometstyles 10:25, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dante's Cove. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.-Sphefx (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf42 12:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Futurama. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stardust8212 12:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ronnie Corbett has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 14:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jeremy Beadle. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. It is particularly offensive to make fun of peoples' handicaps Paul210 (talk) 17:31, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page TEMA (group) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/gruppacomma) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 08:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

[edit] June 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia as you did to Anna Paquin, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. IndulgentReader (talk) 09:21, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Indian Standard Time, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 14:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)