Talk:1946 Pilbara strike

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	1946 Pilbara strike is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia.
Assessment comments The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit · history · watch · refresh) B -- more on the aftermarth and inline reference it'd be GA Gnangarra 01:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

	This article is part of WikiProject Organized Labour, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Organized Labour. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	Organized Labour Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for May 2.
	Assessment comments.

[edit] recent fact tags

redundant really - the problem is the eds creating the article put the refs at the bottom of the art and didnt include them as in article cites - it just needs to be tied in with some judicious checking against which ref has the answer for the tags SatuSuro 01:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree and I've removed them. if the text says "according to McLeod", the logical thing to do is go down to the references section where you will find a work by McLeod. It could probably do with page numbers and the like, but I think the fact tags are redundant. Graham87 09:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC)