User talk:143.231.249.141

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 143.231.249.141, is registered to United States House of Representatives. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact United States House of Representatives to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, United States House of Representatives, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).
Warning Any administrator who blocks this address must immediately notify the Wikimedia Foundation's Communications Committee. This IP is allocated to major governmental organizations and blocks of these organizations have political and public relations implications that must be managed by the Foundation. You are also requested to note this at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Attention:

This host, housegate10.house.gov, is registered to United States House of Representatives, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Contents

[edit] Archives

[edit] January 2007

[edit] Your edit to Tom Stephan

Your recent edit to Tom Stephan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini 20:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nonsense edit in Ray Jackson

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ray Jackson. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Pilotguy (ptt) 21:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ray Jackson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Esurnir 21:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for vandalism, despite previous warnings and blocks for a period of forty-eight hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 22:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Dean Heller. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 21:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dates

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Eras, it is inappropriate to change the era nomenclature for no apparent reason. Thank you. -- Avi 18:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Cleft chin. If you would like to experiment please use the sandbox. Thank you. Seed 2.0 21:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Pythagoras. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FJPB 18:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits to Artur Davis

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 143.231.249.141! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule thecongressionalblackcaucus\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 22:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop spamming Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowbot 22:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Shadowbot 22:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Linkspamming

Can you please stop for a minute and explain your repeated adding of the same link to dozens of articles? Thanks - Alison☺ 22:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to List of United States presidents by age at ascension to office. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WODUP 06:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Dermody. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas(talk) 20:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Fordham University. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --ElKevbo 16:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --ElKevbo 16:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. PrestonH(Review Me!) • (Sign Here!) 01:16, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to David Davis (Tennessee politician). Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you.--Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 20:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Matthew Hill, you will be blocked from editing. --Geniac 12:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Carolyn McCarthy. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rossheth | Talk to me 16:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini hablame aqui 16:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for yet one more day. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini hablame aqui 22:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jena 6, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. mirageinred 23:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Blue Dog Coalition, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. →AzaToth 23:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Charles Duke, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. --Kralizec! (talk) 15:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. →AzaToth 15:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Note

Please stop screwing around with articles for the sake of screwing around. You're part of the United States Government. Act like it. DS (talk) 21:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your Edits to Melissa Hart

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Melissa Hart, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you.

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Lance Bass has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Lance Bass constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gender differences, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C'est moi Parlez 23:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gender differences, you will be blocked from editing. PseudoOne (talk) 23:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eugene V. Debs, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Eugene V. Debs was changed by 143.231.249.141 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-03T01:35:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Communism. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 04:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fitna, you will be blocked from editing. --RenniePet (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] NORML

Thank you for your language lesson on how to pronounce "NORML," but you missed a point. It's how to pronounce "liar." That's what we need to work on, "liar."

You know how NORML and Dale Gieringer lied about what happened in Ukiah, don't you? I'm sure you do, I'm sure you know how NORML tried to cover-up the forced police registration of 420 patients. This registration is what's never supposed to happen in the US. Where are you? You're in America, aren't you? I'm sure you've heard of liberty and freedom where you are. You must be posting from a Southern state or something. But, thanks for your interest in teaching us how to pronounce "NORML." That was nice of you.

Now, how do you pronounce...uhh...Never mind. I don't think you know what I'm talking about.--76.245.122.202 (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jon Porter has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Jon Porter constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Look, I know this is an election year and all, but if your boss is really that good, he won't need a glorifying Wikipedia article to get reelected. Thingg⊕⊗ 17:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC))

[edit] Jon Porter

Hello - could you please explain your objections to this article as presently constituted at Talk:Jon Porter so that we can try to reach consensus on the appropriate wording? Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 17:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to About, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: About was changed by 143.231.249.141 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-14T18:22:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hensarling

You'll no doubt notice that the changes you made to the article on Congressman Hensarling have been... shall we say, toned down. Much of the information which you introduced has been retained (except in those instances where I felt it could be replaced by links to other articles), but your choice of words made you sound like a fawning lickspittle. We are not here to heap insults upon him, but neither are we here to act as a rah-rah booster club.

Also, about those flattering quotes from major newspapers... they can stay, but you'll need to do better than just "the Dallas Morning Star said this!!!" or "the New York Times said that!!!"; can you provide a source? DS (talk) 14:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and "he introduced legislation that would balance the budget in five years without raising taxes!!!" - to be blunt, big fox-hunting deal. What politician doesn't have such a plan? DS (talk) 14:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)