User talk:129.31.40.64

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 129.31.40.64, is registered to Imperial College London and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] Royal Anglians

Hi. not sure why you removed the Hertfordshire Regiment and Cambridgeshire Regiment from the RAR lineage? Although TF/TA only they do form part of the make up of the regiment, with their battle honours etcetera passing on to the present regiment, AFAIK.

Also I added the pre 1881 numbered regiments of foot as they were different entitities to the post Childers Reforms regiments: they only contributed the regular battalions, there were also militia and volunteer battalions that made up the new regiments.

Maybe it made it a bit complicated, but it semed more accurate to me.... Lozleader 22:17, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Fine. Maybe they should! Lozleader 16:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Queen's Own Rifles of Canada

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to The Queen's Own Rifles of Canada, you will be blocked from editing. --Ng.j 02:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Newark North Gate railway station. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ACBest 20:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lincoln Central railway station. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. ACBest 20:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Vandalism to Newark North Gate railway station and Lincoln Central railway station. Two counts of vandalism = 2 levels up = level 4 ACBest 16:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Template:North London Line. Thank you. Olana North (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pascal Chimbonda, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pascal Chimbonda was changed by 129.31.40.64 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-13T09:32:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please stop to change the unit names in the articles of the British Army. As it is the units are named correctly and linked directly to their articles. If you continue to change the names, articles names of the regiments and the links you change to not correspond anymore and thus redirects become necessary. Therefore I ask you to stop and revert the articles to the versions that were before you stated your changes. thanks, --noclador (talk) 15:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to British Rail Class 507 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. StaticGull  Talk  12:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to British Rail Class 508 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. StaticGull  Talk  12:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC))

Hi. As a disinterested third party, I suggest you ignore the two over-zealous vandalism warnings above. Including an informative edit summary is good advice, however, to prevent edits being misconstrued as vandalism in the future. --DAJF (talk) 13:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)