User talk:124.197.2.220

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to United Airlines Flight 175‎, you will be blocked from editing. Your reference shows visible disintegration, so claiming otherwise is vandalism, pure and simple. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United Airlines Flight 175. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 02:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Febraury 2008

Your recent edit to United Airlines Flight 175 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 08:30, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to United Airlines Flight 175 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 08:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to United Airlines Flight 175 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses/phone numbers or Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr or related links to a non-talk page. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 08:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Flight 175

Wikipedia is not a venue for free speech. It is a free (as in monetary and sans copyright) encyclopedia. It is not a place to push ones theories about an event that no one else carries. If you continue to use Wikipedia in a way that it was not meant to be, you will remain blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been blocked for one week because of your persistence in pushing your point of view.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] my reply to Ryulong

I am not pushing anything. I am faithfully giving the FACTS of the event.. can you now see that?

PLEASE CHECK the dubiousness... arbitration hereby requested.

here is what needs to be added.

Footage[1] of the jet visibly melting into the tower was taken from Battery Park by Michael Hezarkhani (video, shown first on CNN) [2].

124.197.2.220 (talk) 08:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Arthur Rubin deleted more

IS THIS A PERSONAL VENDETTA?? What have I done to deserve my contributions being censored?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Derin_devlet&diff=187612745&oldid=187405064

The January 2008 arrests

An organisation calling itself Ergenekon was raided by the police. Although Turkish news is forbidden to report on many details the scandal is enormous. The Prime Minister's only comment was "the state is working". The commentator of the biggest daily said he is not sure which state Erdogan means — the democratic state of the law for everyone or the Deep State. The event was generally not reported in the english-language press/broadcasters as the proximity of turkish and western security organisatorial structure certainly raises questions as to the perpetrators of 911 and other terror atrocities in recent history and in the decades past (Gladio).

POV pushing on one article suggests possible POV pushing on others, so I checked. That addition had a similar POV and was unsourced. IF you can provide a source (here, even while blocked), I'll restore it. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 15:58, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I only added neutral facts to the main articles. Vendetta because I voice my OPINION on a talk page?"

Decline reason: "After reviewing your recent contributions, I am declining your request to be unblock. — nat.utoronto 10:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] March 2008

Your recent edit to Famine, Affluence, and Morality (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 04:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Famine, Affluence, and Morality (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 12:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Famine, Affluence, and Morality (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. Please do not add email addresses/phone numbers, Imageshack/Photobucket/Flickr, or related links to non-talk pages if possible. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II (talk) 12:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I have deleted the link that the bot above has been diligently deleting for two reasons. The secondary one is that blogspot links are generally to be avoided. The primary one is that it appears that the blog entry reposts Singer's essay without permission. The external links policy does not allow links to materials that infringe copyright. If you feel the link should be included, please discuss at the article's talk page, Talk:Famine, Affluence, and Morality, but do not repost the link without discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 12:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)


This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Vandalism

  • Decline reason:

You keep getting blocked because you do not yet have sufficient mastery of neutral point of view and how to use reliable sources. Please, use your block time to carefully read these guidelines, because if you are unable to follow the rules, the next block may well be an indefinite one. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I only added a WORKING LINK -- all reasons you moderators gave so far were NOT RELEVANT, it seems you don't actually read what is going on... you just seem to spend 5 seconds on it and phantasize something up. I AM SHOCKED at this ignorance. --- I JUST ADDED A WORKING LINK ... it is NEUTRAL and RELIABLE."

Decline reason: "Having read the site—and noting that there are no permissions on the page—I don't see anything that indicates that this page does not violate the copyrights policy. —C.Fred (talk) 14:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.