Talk:10 Years
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Plural?
Why is the term 10 Years treated as a plural noun? Refering to the singular band, it should not be so- consequently, i believe that all the verbs should appropriately be changed to apply to the singular form (e.g. Are -> is, were -> was, etc etc). If someone can explain why the band's name is treated as plural, that will suffice, assuming the reason is sound. 24.219.113.171 15:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] genre
EMO?!!! WTF?!!! 10 years is a alternative metal/hard rock band. i'm ok with post-grunge and nu-metal since some songs contain elements of that, BUT NOT EMO! Itachi1452 16:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
regardless of the genre, the fact remains that this band is incredibly untalented.
if you're gonna insult a band, at least first sign your comment. second of all, i'd appreciate it if iyou don't edit my comments. the fact that you didn't sign your commment proves that your too scared to bring this to my face. hey, you want unoriginal musici? look at nickelback or hinder Itachi1452 23:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
sigh, once again, you sabotaged my comment. that means that you're too afraid to even bring it to my face and actually sign your comments.Itachi1452 01:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
sigh, i'm a pussy, once again i demand someone sign their comment, as if a chickenshit like me is going to do ANYTHING about it either way. can someone please put me in contact with 10 years so i can suck their dicks? Itachi1452
WTFWTFWTF EMO?!!!!??? ugh the band is so much better then tht emo crap like fall out boy and panic at the disco and all that shi* dont call them emo! untalented? lmao my ass. lets see you make a band who can keep a single on number 1 for 12 months ay-tigs4melife
[edit] singles
was seasons to cycle really a single??? i don't think so, can someone change the singles back to the way it was? i'm not that good with coding... Itachi1452 16:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
"The vocals of Jesse Hasek exquisitely display the intricate nuances and styles"
This is absurd. Wikipedia is about objective information, not overwritten, masturbatory, self-congratulating marketing copy.
I agree with you! I tried to remove those descriptions, but someone reverted it back! GAY!
please sign your comments. but yeah...i know it's sourced, but seems a little unnecessary. it's like saying in a bio of someone that that person molested dogs or something just out of the blue. Itachi1452 23:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image
I have now tagged the image that is currently being used for the infobox as missing copyright information. However, from what I can tell, the image is a copyrighted by 10yearsfans.net. If someone could upload their own photograph that they release the rights to, than that would be the best option. Otherwise, a more free alternative needs to be found. See WP:IUP for more information. —Akrabbimtalk 02:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rare and Live Tracks
Was this an official album? Looks suspicuously like some kind of bootleg to me. Rehevkor (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

