Talk:Yves Guérin-Sérac
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Hoax
Ganser and all other publication are of dubious quality. My Italian is not that good, but I suggest that if anyone is interested in this article one could use an official senate report: [1]. Pinko1.25 06:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
May I ask some reason explaining why Ganser would be of "dubious quality"? And may I require you not to delete sources without debating the matter before? Thanks. Tazmaniacs
- WP:RS. I do not have to debate the removal of poor references. Pinko1.25 09:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
In "NATO's Secret Armies", Ganser uses roughly 700 references in a 250 page book and he's very careful in choosing legitimate sources of information. He's one of the most knowledgeable researchers on Gladio and devoted 7 years of his life to research the phenomenon. What makes you believe that his claims are dubious? Kyle Michelson 13:04, 23 December (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 08:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

