User talk:Yorxs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Howdy, Yorxs, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.


[edit] Additional tips

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

[edit] Be Bold!!

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Joe I 04:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Diagrams at Surround sound

Can you explain to me why you are replacing my SVG diagrams at Surround sound with pseudo-SVG files that are 150 times larger, in some cases do not render on the Wikimedia servers, and are not in fact SVGs at all but simply embedded bitmaps? I'm reverting to the small versions that display properly until then. Cheers, Stannered 11:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Yorxs Answer: I simply fixed errors in the diagrams, the most important factor for those researching an article. Explained in detail below.

1. The diagram you replaced for Pro-Logic is just flat out wrong, it was not visually accurate to the way pro-logic outputs sound, i.e. missing the center channel. 2. The remaining diagrams you replaced were of poor graphic quality. 3. All of the graphics you replaced looked inconsistant as if they were from different sources, I made them look uniform as the original author of these graphics intended.

I would appreciate it if you were more careful when updating others artwork, as you introduced an error into the article unnecessarily.


1: Could you not have simply asked me to tweak my graphic? I would have done so instantly. I'm sorry, couldn't you have done the same?
2: Are you saying my diagrams were of poor graphic quality, or the ones I was replacing were? The new graphics looked inferior to the graphics you were replacing.
3: You made them look uniform, but at the expense of having real SVG versions. Sorry, I used Adobe Illustrator to make these, not sure why you think they are not real SVG files.

I'm now going to CAREFULLY go and tweak existing images on the page to create new SVGs for the inconsistent images (including your 460K monstrosity). Hope it makes you happy. Stannered 09:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Done. Could you please check for me that they are correct this time, and let me know if not? Stannered 09:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Yorxs Response: Looks great, just so we are clear, I want to work with you not against you. I feel the new set of changes are an all around improvement.