Talk:Yorkshire Dales
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
Yorkshire Dales is included in the 2007 Wikipedia for Schools, or is a candidate for inclusion in future versions. Please maintain high quality standards, and make an extra effort to include free images, because non-free images cannot be used on the CDs. |
 |
Yorkshire Dales is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's assessment scale. See comments for details. |
|
| High | This article has been rated as High-Priority on the Project's priority scale. | |
Can someone who knows clarify this article by listing the Dales in order from south to north. TIA, --mervyn 09:55, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Picture
Can anyone identify the village shown in the picture? Blisco 17:17, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, it's a bit too small for me to work it out. - Politepunk 17:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- Well I've got rid of it anyway, as a photo that size isn't much use. One of the ones I've added needs locating though - the dry stone wall one. I'm guessing it's in the Three Peaks area, probably around Ingleton, but can't work out where it is exactly. The article is looking a bit prettier now - all it needs is some decent text! --Blisco 21:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] National Parks
The number of National Parks has just been changed from 12 to 14 in the article - but this does not line up with National parks of England and Wales. Does anyone know if the change here is correct? Keith D 10:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- I would tend to go with the 12 figure. That is form the actual wiki article, and there are no major citation issues on that page. I won't change it, though, in case anyone objects - Weebiloobil 10:11, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- There are at present 12 national parks, soon to be 13 when the South Downs become one, but that is a long way off. I've changed it to 12. LordHarris 11:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirming it should be 12 & correcting article - the 2 line up now. Keith D 14:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- There are at present 12 national parks, soon to be 13 when the South Downs become one, but that is a long way off. I've changed it to 12. LordHarris 11:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
