User talk:Yamama3000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Yamama3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Kamikaze 07:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion warning

A tag has been placed on Black Pride (Gang), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Black Pride (Gang) is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Black Pride (Gang). Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. MER-C 10:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thai Australian

Could you please attribute your use of ABS informaton in the Thai Australian article. If you need advice please click the link "attributable to a reliable source" below the edit box.Garrie 23:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Bang (nightclub)

A tag has been placed on Bang (nightclub), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mattinbgn/ talk 20:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lara Kappler

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Lara Kappler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattinbgn/ talk 21:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dutch Australian

This article, which you made, is now being considered for deletion. While your contributions are appreciated, this article is believed to not be appropriate for inclusion on wikipedia.You may see the deletion debate here. Please do not take the request for deletion personally, or take its deletion (if it is, infact, deleted) too harshly. Good luck --Anonymous Dissident Utter 14:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Yamama3000. Thanks for placing the {{hangon}} tag on the above article. As the article is not a candidate for speedy deletion I have removed the tag. You can follow the link to the discussion left by Anonymous Dissident above to have your say. I would say it is likely the article will be kept. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 07:42, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spam in The Green Room (venue)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Green Room (venue), by Grahamec (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Green Room (venue) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Green Room (venue), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate The Green Room (venue) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hispanics in Australia and Chilean Australian issues

Hello! The reason I added the unreferenced and POV tags on these particular articles is due to the fact that the statements provided does not provide references or footnotes such as facts or citations to support claims. I have no issues towards that country or the Chilenos, but I am only doing my job, to rid POV's in articles and provide an accurate informations in all articles as much as possible. If, up to dated references is provided, then you can remove the tags. Thanks! - Ramírez 01:15 June 30, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vulture Street edits

Hi! I've seen you editing Powderfinger related articles, and would like to invite you to join WikiProject Powderfinger, an effort by Wikipedians to improve the band's coverage on the encyclopedia. Please consider signing up here.

Giggy UCP 02:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Powderfinger - July Newsletter

The Powderfinger WikiProject Newsletter
Issue I - July 2007
WikiProject Powderfinger News
Discussions & Collaborations
  • There's currently a discussion as to your favourite Powderfinger works, with potential for collaboration. You can join in the discussion here
  • It's been proposed that a more consistent method of collaboration is implemented. You can have your say, and suggest articles for collaboration, on the talk page.
In other music news...
Categorized To-Do List
Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.
If you would like this newsletter delivered in a different format next month, or if you don't wish to receive it, please see here.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter was delivered by ENewsBot · 20:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Nicole Stubbins

A tag has been placed on Nicole Stubbins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia

Hi - I noticed you have worked on a couple of articles such as Uruguayan Australian. I thought you might be interested the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Demographics of Australia which is covering these articles and the associated discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Demographics of Australia‎ Regards --Matilda talk 07:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)