User talk:Xp54321/Archive 4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Contents |
Recent reverts to American Idol (season 7)
Xp, your huggle reverts there weren't helfpul. You for some reason twice reverted to an incorrect version of the page. I see you are flying through with your huggle edits, please make sure the revert is correct before making one. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 16:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Chiropractic revert
Can you explain the reason for this revert? I noticed the user did add a second heading, but other than that, the edit looks pretty valid. What do you find inappropriate about it? Metros (talk) 16:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- The ip edits were very inappropriate. Here is another inappropriate edit which broke a ref citation. QuackGuru 16:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Xp54321 can you explain why it was inappropriate? Why did you revert that? Metros (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Um,I'm sorta confused here.The page history is sorta complicated but i reverted due to loss of content. But the edits are confusing please clarify.Xp54321 (Vandals Beware!!!,Contribs) 16:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- If you're confused and not sure what's going on in an edit, why are you reverting it? Metros (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
All right then!Jeez!What's with the harassment!? A person can't make mistakes!?Xp54321 (Vandals Beware!!!,Contribs) 16:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- The next "mistake" you do and your Huggle access will be taken away. You've had about 4 or 5 conversations in the last 24 hours about errors with Huggle. The next one will result in its removal. Metros (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- The ip edits were all inappropriate. For example, the POV phrase "Critics suggest" was added. The ref citation 17 is still borken. QuackGuru 16:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, fix as necessary.Xp54321 (Vandals Beware!!!,Contribs) 16:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- XP, I suggest slowing down severely. Don't worry so much about how fast you can do this, worry about quality, accuracy. Also, please try to indent when responding to people. Gwynand | Talk•Contribs 16:37, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- I do not want to get into a revert war with an IP. I see a lot of strange editing by the IP. Some text is missing and things have been moved around. I wonder if this is a new editor or an editor forgot to log in. QuackGuru 16:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Message sent in error
Sorry but it seems that the message you've sent to me was sent in error. I was actually reverting an blanking edit by an anonymous user in the Eva Angelina article. Thanks. --Marianian (talk) 16:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Archives
OK, i think ive done it, if it continues to autoarchive give me a bell. Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 16:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Ive added archives for the future to make your job a little easier for when you need to. --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 16:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Edit count
Yesterday you took this off your user page saying it was an exanple of editcountitis. Yet in the last 2 hours, you've updated your edit count on your user page on four separate occasions. There is absolutely no need to constantly update it. Metros (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Metros, drop it now. --Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 16:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
