User talk:Xombie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Xombie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --GreenReaper 16:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


Asexuality: Famous Asexuals

I agree with what you said about looking for proof backed up by references for the people included in that section. While perfect proof would be unrealistic (just as sometimes 'heterosexual' people turn out to be different), I think there should be a high level of proof based on evidence so far (>=90, 95, 99%?). In the past there were daft vandalisms such as adding Rivers Cuomo and Trent Reznor. Your request for citations seems to tie up with, for example, the tightening of policy on the Wikipedia deaths page (q.v.). Samantha of Cardyke 11:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for removing António de Oliveira Salazar due to lack of supporting evidence. As he was very high-profile as Prime Minister of Portugal (a Western nation) you would think that evidence would have turned up by now. Samantha of Cardyke 14:44, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello,

PLEASE stop just blanking my edits. If you do not, I will take this to an arbitration. I agree that sources should be stated, so I'm doing so. If you don't like the source or the way they are quoted, then change that - but don't just blank the page ! 84.190.195.129 23:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

I am blanking your edits because they do not meet Wikipedia guidelines, which I have outlined in the discussion page. There is nothing to change the source to, because what you are editing in is completely unverified rumors with no reliable source. There is no reason to keep them in the article if they are simply unencyclopedic original research and false allegations. Arbitration would find in my favor. --Xombie 23:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
If you cared to check the sources, you would find that they are all from respectable works or sites. If I may give one example : [1].
Btw the iist not not supposed to be a list of people the are 100 % sure to have ben asexual (there is no way to draw up a list likel that , but rather a list of peoplöe where there is evidence pointing in that direction.
If the information is not fact, then it is not valid. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability. --Xombie 23:21, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 2006 FIFA World Cup controversies

Hi Xombie! Thanks for your recent interest in the AfD of the 2006 World Cup controversies article. Your input is most appreciated. Since the AfD is now closed and the World Cup almost over, I'd like to encourage you to put some input into the improvement of this article, either by improving where you think you can, or by suggesting changes on the talk page. Kind regards, MyNameIsNotBob 03:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] ggzidane.com

Wow, that website devolved into madness as soon as the comments was added. Before it was just the gif without comments. sikander 21:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Why are you changing my comments?

Why are you changing my comments, i am writing true facts thats are backed by with evedence, i am correcting the information already presented. You should not have blocked me, it is unfair that you wont let others present what they know. (comment by Pichu1)

[edit] Your edits to Southwestern Company

I have reverted your recent edits to Southwestern Company article because they violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Please do not make edits like this. --Richard 05:47, 3 June 2007 (UTC)