Talk:Wu Shu-chen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

[edit] Chang Jung Ts'ai

Chang's car accident has been reported in Taiwan by many sources of various political background. The story in this article was translated from an article published by Taiwan Daily on May 11 and 12, 2006. This paper has been known as biased to the DDP and Chen. However, due to its poor finanical status, it went out of business in June, 2005. You can only access that report by using an Internet archive. -- Toytoy 08:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

As the deliberate running over of someone six times in an attempt to murder them cannot reasonably be labeled a "car accident," I have reworded the section accordingly. --Bri 12:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

There is absolutely no verifiable evidence to show that the incident is anything more than an accident. Terming it an attack is POV. I'm reverting, and please don't re-revert without some solid evidence. --Nlu (talk) 09:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, you can't have it both ways. The section can't state that Ts'ai was "trying to murder her" but refer to the incident as an "accident." I'm reverting it back to my original edit. If you have a problem with it, then fix the section to go one way or the other or do something else constructive, but don't try to pick a fight with me by leaving idiotic tags on my talk page accusing me of NPOV edits, OK? --Bri 10:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, you can have it both ways. You can state that some believe it was an innocent accident, where some others believe it was deliberate. Then you can also note that those who believe it was deliberate are themselves believed to be taking advantage of an innocent accident. Terming it as an attack is definitely POV; sayint for sure it wasn't an accident is definitely POV. I believe the latter -- but that isn't the point of Wikipedia... well, it isn't supposed to be the point... LOL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.109.181.61 (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC).