Talk:WrestleMania 2000
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Southern California, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage and content of articles relating to Southern California, its people, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. | ||
 |
This article is also supported by WikiProject California. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
WrestleMania 2000 is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Title
Seeing as how other WrestleMania articles are titled according to the name and style promoted by WWF/E that year (WrestleMania X-Seven, WrestleMania X8, etc), shouldn't this article be titled WrestleMania 2000? Jeff Silvers 19:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed. In fact, I'm going to propose a move right now for this article. --Oakster 17:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
WrestleMania XVI → WrestleMania 2000 – More commonly refered to as WrestleMania 2000 rather than WrestleMania XVI. Redirect at WrestleMania 2000 has page history preventing simple renaming.
[edit] Voting
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Support - Makes sense. tv316 17:41, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Lox (t,c) 22:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Makes sense --201.214.197.176 14:48, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
The move has been successful, thanks for voting. --Oakster 10:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tag Line
I believe that the tag line for Wrestlemania 2000 was "A McMahon In Every Corner" but am unable to verify this, can anyone check this out? Sparkyboi 23:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I have the original DVD (pre-WWE). It is in fact "A McMahon in every corner!" AndarielHalo 23:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] TLC match?
I know that the WWF Tag Team title match was a ladder match. But if you look at the "Mania Madness" section at WM23 page, they label this match as a TLC match. This match was considered as a precedent of the TLC match, I know. But wasn't this an interesting fact? Xbox6 17:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- It wasn't a TLC match though, and wwe.com's results page for WM 2000 just calls it a ladder match as well: [1]. TJ Spyke 22:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Two Fall Triple Threat Match
Does it count as two losses for Angle and one win and a loss for Benmoit or because it was in the context of one match does it only count as one loss apeice for each??? KE
- It was 1 match that was 2 falls long (like how a 2/3 falls match is still 1 match). As for how it counts on the win/loss record, i'm not sure. I count it as a loss for Angle and a win for both Jericho and Benoit (regarding the PPV Win% I maintain), but it's not official. You could try asking WWE, but they never reply to e-mails. TJ Spyke 21:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WM2000hhh.jpg
Image:WM2000hhh.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WM2000live.jpg
Image:WM2000live.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:WM2000triladder.jpg
Image:WM2000triladder.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
