Talk:WorldWide Telescope
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Reception
The reception section is biased. It needs to be reworked or researched for an alternative for 'reception'--67.166.110.86 (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Odd concept of resolution
I noticed this in the article: "with a resolution to 100,000 feet above sea level." That doesn't exactly mean anything, it only tells (I assume) the satellite took the pictures from an altitude of ~30,5km. Could someone find the actual meters/pixel resolution for the imagery? --piksi (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Issues
The issues is just a drive-by attack. The section and statement should be removed.
It is based on this posted in the forum of the citation link;
"redxeth at 09:00 PM on 05/13/08 Reply by Email * @redxeth-- figured it out. Be sure to delete setup.exe from your Download directory-- apparently the setupwwt.exe is expanded into setup.exe.
redxeth at 09:01 PM on 05/13/08 Reply by Email * Figured out my install issue-- be sure to delete any existing setup.exe files in your Downloads directory! "
This *is* beta software, and you can download the isntall to places *other* than the directory he chose -- this is just ridiculous to be included. Is that really an "issue" with WWT?
- Well if you don't include it, people may waste several hours trying to install this excellent software. I was unable to install it until I found the solution on this forum. This is a very minor issue. but it can give you a big headache if you do not know the solution.Mohit Agarwal (talk) 21:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
