User talk:Wooddoo-eng

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Sean Hayes

Change to whatever u think is more appropriate! i am not sticking to any transliteration. (is it actually ME who translate the name?) :P --User:Yacht (talk) 11:04, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC)

i know how that feels. just like the stupid Bush, has three translations in mainland(布什), Hong Kong (布殊) and Taiwan (布希, correct?). that's a good habit. just like when i'm speaking Cantonese, i can't stand the translation of "布什" (u can see how funny the mainland Cantonese media follow the mainland's translation calling him "布什" in Cantonese :D). maybe i tend to use English instead! nice job, man! --User:Yacht (talk) 11:30, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "Syntax" in Chinese

  • Excuse me, I saw you change the link of "Syntax" in Chinese wikipedia from "語法學" to "句法學"...Any reason for this change? I just think they are the same thing. When the entry in Chinese now is "語法學" but not "句法學", I tend to modify it to the former.--Bellenion 20:09, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Guess who i am

Ten little niggers went to dine,

One choked himself and then there were nine.

--Chris0000 08:51, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

That's easy. French-lover.--wooddoo Eppur si muove 08:55, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Faye Wong

Hello Wooddoo-eng, I'm glad to see you are still editing. You made several contributions to Faye Wong including this edit; please can you provide sources for these statements? e.g.

  • the value of her EMI contract, HK$60m;
  • her quotation that she wished to produce "music that I like. I do not care if others don't, though I would be delighted if they do";
  • Faye Wong (1997) didn't sell well in Hong Kong and other damaged areas in Asia, but it did quite well in Taiwan. Also in the mainland, that really got the greater audience's attention. Her status began to rise sharply in China.

We need to quote references for such statments in order to get the article up to Good Article status. I do hope you can help again with this. - Fayenatic london (talk) 19:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks for replying in detail. Even though we haven't identified sources, I won't delete these points because they are not disputed. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)