Talk:Wizard's Rule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance)
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article is within the scope of the Sword of Truth WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Terry Goodkind's The Sword of Truth series. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

I actually think the 1st rule ends with the first sentance.... it certainly doesn't include the rest of the quoted text.. that was just Zed's explaination of how the rule works to Richard ---

Same goes for the 6th rule. Again it ends with the first sentance.

• Agreed, I've edited all the rules to reflect Terry Goodkind's site: http://www.terrygoodkind.com/Truth.php Darric 19:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• Anyone object to me placing the chapters for where the rules are mentioned in? And also a link to this Wizard's Rules page: http://www.terrygoodkind.net/rules.php? It's from Goodkind's other website, the .net as opposed to the .com site. It seems to be a more detailed source for the Rules. I even think it would be a good idea to place the "Explanations" from the site, seems like good information for Wikipedia. Any thoughts? UniversalMigrator 23:54, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Debate over the final rule:

There has been no shortage of debate over the last rule on Goodkind's own Official Web Site. Until the matter is settled by either Goodkind, or one of Goodkind's agents after conferring with the author, I move that the editing of this section of the wiki be suspended. The posts here should be based on information as "factual" as possible, and the main page is not the proper venue for posting opinions at this point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.227.105 (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The very fact that there are two competing ultimate rules in the current article shows that the identity of the rule (if it's meant to be identifiable) is unclear. As such, the article cannot take a specific stand on it, no matter how obvious the answer may seem to particular editors. Brendan Moody (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)