User talk:Wise mike

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello. By adding a link to the Coptic Orthodox Church web site to the list at the bottom of the Eastern Orthodoxy article without a comment stating that it is not one of the canonical Eastern Orthodox churches may create an erroneous impression in the reader's mind that it is one of them. I added a comment. Michael Hardy 21:23, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Hello.It seems that wise mike added the link in eastern orthodoxy page by mistake as the words Oriental and Eastern are the same in Arabic Language.

Contents

[edit] Saint takla haymanot

I apologize, but Wikipedia cannot accept content copied from most other sources. All Wikipedia content must be licensed under the GFDL. If you would like to rewrite your article(s) using original content, please do so on the associated Temp page(s).

--Slowking Man 08:18, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)

My mistake. --Slowking Man 00:45, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Image:St-Takla.org

Would you be able to upload a copy of this image without the "St-Takla.org" tagline in the corner? It's a little distracting. Thanks. --Slowking Man 00:45, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)


done :) -- Wise_Mike

[edit] External links

Hi Mike,

Just to let you know that you are getting overenthusiastic on adding links to your Coptic Orthodox Church site. If you don't get round to it first, I'll tidy them up when I get some time. There are a couple that are relevant, but many such as the links on architecture and color are way off the mark. It might help to look over the guidelines at Wikipedia:External links. -- Solipsist 21:12, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Please do not use Wikipedia to increase the popularity of a site you own or just like. Jdavidb 19:28, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
I am sorry.. I noticed this mistake.. especially that of "color" page.. but that of Architecture is on the right place as there is Islamic Architecture at the same page too.. Anyway.. I'll be more careful with that next time.. thx for the note.. wise_mike , 6 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not add any more links

Mike, please see these discussions:

Thanks, --A. B. (talk) 16:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


Thanks for the note A. B. I have added a reply to the discussions page, please check it out. And please note that it is not a spam by any ways, maybe at the very begining I was a bit enthusiastic about the Wikipedia idea, but afterwords I mainly never resubmitted links that were removed, and in the past couple of years I added just 2 links. Of course if this is making any kind of issues, I'd totally respect a decision of not adding any more links. Or I can suggest them to one of the editors.. Please also deliver this to those associated with this issue. Thanks. Wise_Mike (talk) 17 February 2008 (UTC)