Winkelman v. Parma City School District
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Winkelman v. Parma City School District | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
| Argued February 27, 2007 Decided May 21, 2007 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| Holding | ||||||||||||
| Parents can file suits under IDEA pro se because they are vindicating parental rights, rather than strictly enforcing the rights of their children | ||||||||||||
| Court membership | ||||||||||||
| Chief Justice: John Glover Roberts, Jr. Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito |
||||||||||||
| Case opinions | ||||||||||||
| Majority by: Kennedy Joined by: Roberts, Alito, Stevens, Souter, Breyer, Ginsburg Concurrence by: Scalia Joined by: Thomas |
||||||||||||
| Laws applied | ||||||||||||
| 20 U. S. C. ยง1400(d)(1)(A) | ||||||||||||
Winkelman v. Parma City School District, 550 U.S. ___ (2007), is a civil suit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. Justice Kennedy held for the seven-justice majority that parents may file suit under IDEA pro se. Justice Kennedy declined to reach the question whether parents may represent the interests of their children pro se, instead concluding that IDEA created a set of independently enforceable rights in parents.
Contents |
[edit] Decision
| Please help improve this article or section by expanding it. Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion. (May 2007) |
[edit] Concurrence
Justice Scalia filed a concurrence in which Justice Thomas joined.

