User talk:Winhunter/IPOF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Its contents should be preserved in their current form. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

So Delete It

I don't give a shit anymore... this place is impossible to work with. EZZIE 15:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)


BRAWK

BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK BRAWK. You know what this is about. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Centripetal Farce (talkcontribs) 04:14, 21 June 2006 .


integrity of the pages?

no one cares what's on my talk page...what i've talked about...or whatever. except you. and it's a bit creepy to think that is the case. i've read the articles regarding talk pages and there's no clear-cut rule that says removing content is vandalism. see [1] for more details. and please do not harass me. being a member or RC or and admin doesn't make you above the rules. 24.148.67.72 05:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


Urs Meir

I was just removing vandalism.

People were posting along the lines of "IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL.IT WAS NOT A FOUL."

If thats ok with you.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.50.126.8 (talkcontribs) 13:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)