Talk:Winchester Super Short Magnum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

[edit] case volume

I removed the lines about case volume being smaller but able to hold more powder, because it just isn't true and there don't seem to be any references for even suggesting it. I suspect it was a misunderstanding of other efficiency related information about this cartridge. There ARE examples of cases that while smaller are able to generate higher velocity, but not cases that are smaller but able to hold more powder (that would make them larger).

And if anyone has a picture of all three cartridges in the family it'd make a nice addition. Arthurrh 18:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge with WSM

I've been wondering if we shouldn't merge this with Winchester Short Magnum and just make it an additional section there? Arthurrh 18:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)