User talk:Willwl123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Willwl123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. Tony Fox (speak) 05:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Adding unrelated external links to articles is considered vandalism. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing.

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:Munger1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Munger1.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Phil123.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Phil123.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:BSCathletics.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BSCathletics.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Phil123.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Phil123.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Notability of Alex Loeb

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Alex Loeb, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Alex Loeb seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Alex Loeb, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 17:30, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BSCathletics.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BSCathletics.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IceKarmaॐ 03:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Loeb's Department Store

Dude... there's a right way and a wrong way to do things on here; that wasn't one of them. Calm, rational discussion works much better. A simple "Some of your information on the Loeb's (department store) is wrong," then a procession to identify what was wrong with it would have sufficed.

I live in Meridian, but I don't know every single fact about every single building in the city. Does that mean I don't know what I'm talking about? No. Maybe I was wrong about the Alex Loeb Building and the National Register of Historic Places part, but I still added some quality information to the article. I also refrained from plagiarism as much as possible (one of the rules of Wikipedia) by rewording and adding to the words/sentences typed by others.

About the painter thing: Just because I called him a painter, does that make all the other information I added completely false? No. I didn't reference the painter part, so you could have just taken it out and given a reason. I simply typed "Alex Loeb" in the search bar, found the "painter" one, looked on your talk page and saw that you had a section about Alex Loeb the painter, realized that you regularly edit the Loeb's article, and assumed the two Alex Loebs were the same people.

Also, is Image:Meridian MS Loeb's Building.JPG not qualified to be in this article? The image is of the department store itself....

Why don't we carry on with this conversation on the talk page of the article instead of here? -Dudemanfellabra (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)