Talk:William Patrick Patterson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

[edit] Comment 1

Made history consistent with other wikipages. Baby Dove 06:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

You call it vandalism, but the chats in these pages are repeating the same as in WPP's book, word by word in some cases. Maybe Rick Ross is not such a respectable guy and he copies other's researches. Regartds, Baby Dove 16:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

1. Read what you wrote: You did't say RR copied WPP (which is true), you said WPP based his info on RR as it is said on his webpage. This is a complete made up lie which uses chat on a blog (apparantly Wpp's webpage) to back it up. I don't know what you tried to do there but using a blog to support it is out of the question. Aeuio 19:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

If you are not satisfied with bloggers, tell them not to spoil your idea on WPP. The RR site predates WPP with information on AH & RB. And you should notice that I did not put it back, because I do not like this blogsipping on anybody. But it is still to see who copied who. Regards, Baby Dove 23:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Rick Ross wouldn't personally know anything about Horn or anyone else, he picked it up from different articles and WPP's "Gurdjieff Journal". Aeuio 00:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia articles with topics of unclear importance

I have tagged this article for notability. See general notability guidelines here [1] and specific notability guidelines for people here [2] for explanation. Note there is a significant backlog of articles for review.--Moon Rising 04:15, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion

Since this page is quoted in the Fourth Way article, and in the Fellowship of Friends article, it is relevant that the merits of this Fourth Way teacher are shown here. Regards, Baby Dove 01:47, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the speedy tag as it didn't meet the criterion cited, but I'm not sure what the man is exactly (hence the clarify tag), a businessman? academic? journalist? Couldn't decide which bio-stub template to use. - Zeibura^(talk) 07:54, 16 June 2007 (UTC)