Talk:William Farel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

William Farel is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)
William Farel falls within the scope of WikiProject Calvinism, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Calvinism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

[edit] Unsupported

I find that the following statement is unsupported:

"Interesting to note that as Calvin's friend, Farel was a promoter of Lutheran ideas in his youth. Today Calvinism and Lutheranism are two complete separate denominations, but Farel's relationship with both would show they had more in common than what is shown today."

More appropriate is to discuss the ideas that Farel held (or "promoted" as this other author writes) and how they fall into the matrix of Reformation-era ideas. Indeed, many of Calvin's ideas were said first by Farel. In this sense, Calvin himself was not Calvinist, but "Farelian." Farel was not the genius, nor the writer that Calvin was, so Calvin is appropriately better remembered than Farel.

Additionally, the agreements and disagreements between the Calvinist and Lutheran camps, to their very beginnings, are well-documented. Their documentation belongs in a separate article.

Also, is there any evidence that Farel was in the Lutheran circle? Please present it. If such evidence exists, I think the logical conclusion is to say that Farel was a full participant in the development of ideas during the Reformation, not that Lutheranism and Calvinism once "had more in common."
I hear that a Montreal scholar is soon publishing a book on Farel. Hopefully that publication will allow us to clear this up.
Sierravista uva 03:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)