Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Article Improvement Drive/Removed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This Wikipedia page is currently inactive and is retained as a historical archive. A historical page is either no longer relevant or consensus has become unclear. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you should seek broader input via a forum such as the proposals page of the village pump. |
[edit] Improvement
[edit]
- 2 votes, Nominated February 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by February 21, 2007 Overdue
- Support
- --Polaron | Talk 14:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- V60 VTalk · VDemolitions · Editor review 2! 03:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- This is the only non-bridge highway that is listed in the National Register of Historic Places and deserves better treatment than what the current state of the article is. --Polaron | Talk 14:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Isn't it there because of its bridges though? --NE2 06:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- There are a number of sections of U.S. Route 66 on the Register, I am certain that this isn't the only non-bridge road on there. Just FYI.A mcmurray 20:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
- 2 votes, Nominated February 25, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by March 11, 2007 Overdue
- Support
- wL<speak·check·chill> 12:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- V60 VTalk · VDemolitions · VRoads 03:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- Detailed article about major artery in the South Bay. However it's filled with original research. --wL<speak·check·chill> 12:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
- J-A10 T · C 02:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 03:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- V60 干什么？ · VDemolitions · VRoads (路) 14:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Krimpet (talk/review) 06:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- This article needs major adjustments to its section headings. It is the longest road in Pennsylvania and has much detail but it is not organized. -- J-A10 T · C 02:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
- Mihsfbstadium 04:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 04:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 20:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- Its the lowest main interstate route that is not B Class or better. Mihsfbstadium 04:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Expansion
[edit]
- 1 vote, Nominated February 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by February 21, 2007 Overdue
- Support
- TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- Nominating based on article being nominated for AfD. No vote. Holderca1 17:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- All of the NYCR articles need work. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 04:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
- 0 votes, Nominated February 14, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by February 21, 2007 Overdue
- Support
- Comments
- Nominating based on article being nominated for AfD. No vote. Holderca1 17:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
- 1 vote, Nominated February 22, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by March 1, 2007 Overdue
- Support
- TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 18:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- Renomination from previous week. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 18:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
- 1 vote, Nominated February 22, 2007; needs at least 4 votes by March 8, 2007 Overdue
- Support
- TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 03:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- A skeleton of an article. Needs a good description and a rewrite of the lead, among other things. TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 03:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit]
- Mihsfbstadium 04:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- JohnnyBGood t c VIVA! 22:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- V60 干什么？ · VDemolitions · VRoads (路) 14:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comments
- Its the only Interstate Main Route Number to be listed as a stub. Getting it to at least start would be fairly easy. Mihsfbstadium 04:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- uhm actually all of the ones you just listed are rated as 'start'. So unless you can find me another Interstate highway rated as stub its the only one. --Mihsfbstadium 08:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- They are all tagged as stubs. I-37 has no more content than this one, it just has an exit list. --Holderca1 16:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I removed two of the stub tags from I-19 and I-59, but I-29 and I-37 are definitely stubs and I downgraded their status on the talk page. --Holderca1 16:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also, one last thing, no need to get so defensive. I am not saying this article doesn't deserve its nomination, just want to make sure that we don't think it is the only one that needs work. --Holderca1 16:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- ROTFLMAO if you think that was defensive uhm that was just pointing a fact out that according to those pages they were rated as starts. BTW I do agree with them being as starts since I thought I saw them all with an exit list unless I was mistaken. I consider a stub to be just the intro and maybe some history of the route. an exit list I would think brings it up a notch. in anycase thats a discussion for a diffrent time. In anycase just a minor ramble here. --Mihsfbstadium 10:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I will agree to disagree with you. An exit list is fairly easy to create and I don't think that it makes it a start class article. Actually I-37 rating was start before I added the exit list. I-29 doesn't have an exit list and only has two sentences of prose. Tables, photos, maps all help complement an article and are required to get the article to a certain rating, but the prose itself has to meet those standards on its own as well. --Holderca1 13:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- ROTFLMAO if you think that was defensive uhm that was just pointing a fact out that according to those pages they were rated as starts. BTW I do agree with them being as starts since I thought I saw them all with an exit list unless I was mistaken. I consider a stub to be just the intro and maybe some history of the route. an exit list I would think brings it up a notch. in anycase thats a discussion for a diffrent time. In anycase just a minor ramble here. --Mihsfbstadium 10:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
